An alternate juror in the Sean Combs trial has revealed that they 'believed' the accounts of Cassie and Jane Doe, who accused Combs of sexual assault and abuse. However, the juror stated that their difficulty in reaching a verdict stemmed from a lack of definitive proof of Combs' 'intent.' The alternate juror sat through the entirety of the seven-week trial, observing the testimonies and evidence presented. This perspective sheds light on the complexities involved in assessing intent in such cases, even when believing the alleged victims' narratives.