A judge has criticized the arguments made by book authors in a case against Meta regarding the use of their works for AI training. The judge took issue with the authors' analogy comparing the AI training process to schoolchildren learning from books. Specifics of the ruling remain under wraps, but the disagreement signals a potential shift in how courts are viewing copyright law in the context of rapidly advancing AI technology. This difference in judicial opinion highlights the complexities and ongoing debate surrounding fair use and intellectual property in the age of artificial intelligence, which could have significant implications for future AI development and copyright enforcement.